Showing posts with label North Korea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North Korea. Show all posts

Saturday, August 17, 2019

Trump turns U.S. Forces Korea into 'transactional' army



By Oh Young-jin
August 16, 2019 "Information Clearing House" -   U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) is under attack not by enemy but by its own commander-in-chief, President Donald Trump.

Trump is prioritizing the size of the bill host Korea pays toward upkeep and is indulging himself in an unwarranted bromance with the head of the enemy.

The risk is bringing confusion to the mission and raison d'etre of the peacekeepers and freedom fighters who have stood ready for decades to throw down their lives to help protect Koreans from North Korean invasions and assert a U.S.-led balance of power in the region where interests of big powers often clash. So a blow to the USFK credibility is feared.

Already, Trump's first defense secretary, James Mattis, the soldier of the soldiers, called it quits over Trump's acts of belittling the allies, calling them freeloaders being piggybacked by the U.S., and his boss's readiness to sleep with enemies like the North's young dictator Kim Jong-un and Russia's Vladimir Putin.

With Mattis out, there has been no stopping Trump, who has become even more eager to get his message as "transactional" promoter of American interests across the voters for his re-election in the November 2020 vote.

As hosts, Koreans are getting tired of his incessant demand for more money despite their appreciation of a key role played by U.S. troops here to keep the North at bay. But some of them openly questioned whether Trump is relegating USFK to the level of hired guns or a bunch of soldiers of fortune.

Oh Young-jin (foolsdie@gmail.comfoolsdie5@koreatimes.co.kr) is the digital managing editor of The Korea Times.
Recently, the New York Post reported that Trump has boasted that it was easier to extract a billion dollars from Korea than a delayed payment of $114.13 in apartment rent ― a reference to his being a real estate developer.

This report followed a reported U.S. demand that Korea should pay $5 billion in the so-called cost sharing burden needed to keep the USFK in Korea. It is five times the $850 million Korea has paid for this year. Trump also said that Korea has paid little in protection money.

One commentator wondered aloud whether if Korea pays what the U.S. reportedly demands, it would make GIs mercenaries that work for money with no regard to common cause and purpose.

USFK commander, Gen. Robert Abrams stresses the importance of the alliance whenever he has a chance and even the visiting new Secretary of Defense Mark Esper referred to the two countries' alliance as being iron-clad.

Rarely does Trump talk about the state of the alliance or even the a-word itself.

He was heard saying, he saved Korea from war, when he visited the South-North border June 30 before meeting the North's Kim.

Also worrisome are Trump's dealings with Kim. He has dismissed Kim's daily missile tests as nothing unusual, even though they involved ballistic missiles, so were in violation of the current international sanctions.

He often called Kim's letters "beautiful" and took sides with Kim when the North Korean apparently complained about the allies' simulated exercise. The American president said that he didn't like the exercise either because it costs too much.

Following their first summit in Singapore, Trump revealed that the U.S. wouldn't hold key joint military exercises with South Korea unilaterally without consulting it in advance.

Military exercises are key to maintaining readiness, especially to the current formula of alliance in which forces of Korea and the U.S. should work together under the combined command structure, their importance can't be over-emphasized as they can save the soldiers' lives in real battle. It is not fair to deprive GIs as well as Korean soldiers of training they deserve in the job that they put their lives on the line for.

The "Trumpification" of the USFK is taking place in the context of the escalating contest of hegemony between the U.S. and China. It is seen as a move by the U.S. to reduce its commitment, while the erstwhile beneficiaries are starting to contemplate whether an era of Pax Americana is coming to an end.

The U.S. withdrawal has already been confirmed in Europe where the U.S.-led NATO security structure is now reduced to a shadow of its former self as the result of Trump's incessant attacks, giving rise to the revanchist Putin of Russia.

We may be witnessing a multipolar world order with the U.S. being diminished to one of the regional powers together with the rising China and resurgent Russia with Europe thrown in a lump.

Likely to come together are rogue states like North Korea that would behave more freely than before in a world where neither universal rules of governance nor their enforcers exist.

One day, we may remember today as the end of the belle epoch leading to a brave new world and Trump in footnote as a facilitator. USFK would be one of victims like other alliance structures that fell under the sword of Trump's mercantilism.
This article was originally published by "Korea Times" -
==See Also==

South Korea should not bow to Trump’s demands: “If Trump wins in 2020, he will pull US troops out of South Korea.”

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52108.htm

JUST NEWS published this article following the Creative Commons rule. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.

Sunday, July 21, 2019

Korea: In the Era of Peace, Dissolve the UN Command, A Relic of the Cold War




Global Research, July 21, 2019


On July 7, 1950, the United Nations Security Council recommended the creation of a US-led the unified command, but the United States referred to it as the United Nations Command using the name of the United Nations.
As the UN Secretary-General has confirmed twice, the United Nations Command in Korea is not a subsidiary organ of the United Nations.
However, the United Nations Command has the authority to start a war on the Korean peninsula without a UN Security Council resolution, to take over North Korean region, and to use Japanese bases and services without consulting with the Japanese government.
Therefore, the United Nations Command in Korea is a dangerous war apparatus that can threaten the peace on the Korean peninsula and the peace constitution of Japan away from the armistice agreement.
The United Nations Command, which has been acting like an organ of the United Nations, in Korea has long been criticized by the international community, and as a result, the resolution to dissolve the UNC passed at the 30th United Nations General Assembly in 1975.
Headquarters of the United Nations Command and ROK-US Combined Forces Command in 2009. (Source: FlickrSecretary of State visits CFC’s White HouseUNC – CFC – USFK)
Even before the conclusion of the peace treaty, the UNC is an organization that should have already been dissolved.
However, there is a movement, against the era of peace on the Korean Peninsula, to strengthen the UNC.
It also creates direct obstacles such as controlling military and economic cooperation projects between South and North Korea.
This is contrary to the wishes of the citizens of Korea, Japan and other member states of the United Nations, and we strongly demand the dissolution of the United Nations Command in Korea.
  1. The US government should dissolve the United Nations Command in South Korea.
  2. The US government, through the United Nations Command in Korea, should not interfere with inter – Korean cooperation projects.
  3. The UN should stop the United Nations Command the use of the name “the United Nations”.
  4. The United Nations should force the United States to implement its 1975 resolution to dissolve the UNC.
The participation of other personal or peace organizations would also be highly appreciated.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Featured image: Members of the United Nations Command Honor Guard Company. (Public Domain)



https://www.globalresearch.ca/era-peace-dissolve-unc-relic-cold-war/5684188



JUST NEWS published this article following the Creative Commons rule. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.

Friday, July 5, 2019

North Korea Slams US Hostility. Donald Invites Kim to the White House




Global Research, July 05, 2019


Last week, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Trump met at the DMZ separating both Koreas.
DJT became the first sitting US president to set foot on North Korean territory, a symbolic gesture only while unacceptably hardline US policies against the country remain unchanged.
Following their meeting, lasting about an hour, Kim said he’d meet with Trump anytime. DJT invited Kim to the White House, saying it would take time to arrange a visit.
Both leaders get along with each other amicably. Two summits and a third meeting achieved nothing toward changing hardline US policies toward the DPRK.
When summits or other bilateral talks are held between Washington and ruling authorities of nations it doesn’t control, one-sided unacceptable demands are made in return for hollow promises.
Time and again, when agreements are made they’re breached by the US.
Bush/Cheney renounced the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and asserted the right to develop and test new weapons of mass destruction.
Their regime abandoned the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) because it expressly forbids development, testing and deployment of missile defenses like its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and related programs.
They refused  to adopt a proposed Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT) that would prohibit further weapons-grade uranium and plutonium production and prevent new nuclear weapons to be added to present stockpiles.
They spurned efforts for nuclear disarmament to advance WMDs and retain current arsenals.
They rescinded and subverted the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) to illegally develop new biowarfare weapons.
They renounced the 1989 US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, prohibiting “the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons.”
Trump abandoned the JCPOA nuclear deal and INF Treaty. Time and again in dealing with other nations, the US pledges one thing, then does something entirely different, its word hardly ever its bond, how all hegemons operate, by their own rules, no others.
All of the above shows Washington can never be trusted. North Korea felt its oppressive sting time and again since Harry Truman’s early 1950s aggression.
Earlier US promises made were breached — why dealing with its ruling authorities fails time and again.
An ulterior motive drives Trump’s outreach to North Korea and willingness to meet with Iranian President Rouhani anytime without preconditions.
He’s jealous of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize, knows it’s awarded to warrior presidents abhorrent of peace, and wants one for himself.
In his heart of hearts, he scorns peace, equity, and justice, is uncaring about the welfare of ordinary people everywhere, and seeks relationships with other nations benefitting US interests at their expense.
His sanctions war and other hostile actions show contempt for North Korea, Iran, and other nations.
His outreach for talks with Kim and Iran’s Rouhani is head-fake deception. Both leaders know he and other hardline US officials can never be trusted.
Hostility and betrayal defined US policies toward the KRPK and Islamic Republic throughout their history.
Trump heads the most extremist right-wing regime in US history, at war on humanity at home and abroad.
There’s virtually no prospect whatever for anything approaching normal US relations with all countries it doesn’t control.
It’s why diplomacy with the US is a waste of time, a serial lawbreaker operating exclusively by its own rules — breaching international laws, treaties and conventions, including its own Constitution and statute laws.
Good faith outreach by other countries to the US isn’t reciprocated.
With the days earlier Kim/Trump meeting fresh in the minds of both leaders, North Korea’s UN mission denounced the US as “hellbent on hostile acts,” suggesting a short-lived DMZ thaw now reversed.
The press statement responded to a Trump regime accusation that Pyongyang breached a cap on refined oil imports, along with a letter by the US, Britain, France, and Germany to all UN member states to enforce unacceptable sanctions on the DPRK.
Its UN mission said
“(w)hat can’t be overlooked is the fact that this joint letter game was carried out by the permanent mission of the United States to the UN under instruction of the State Department, on the very same day when President Trump proposed for the summit meeting.”
It “speaks to the reality that the United States is practically more and more hell-bent on the hostile acts against the DPRK, though talking about the DPRK-US dialogue.”
“It is quite ridiculous for the United States to continue to behave obsessed with sanctions and pressure campaign against the DPRK, considering sanctions as a panacea for all problems.”
Enforcing them against North Korea, a nation at peace with its neighbors, threatening none anywhere, aim to crush its economy and immiserate its people.
They’re instruments of maliciousness. Improved DPRK relations with the US are unattainable as long as economic sanctions remain in place.
Refusal by the Trump regime to remove or even soften them shows further Kim/Trump talks will be just as futile as earlier ones.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Award-winning author Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)
His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Featured image is a White House photo



JUST NEWS published this article following the Creative Commons rule. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Hope for a Breakthrough in Korea



Donald Trump will ultimately have to remind his national security adviser and secretary of state who is president if there’s to be progress on North Korea.

By Ray McGovern

July 01, 2019 "Information Clearing House" -  There is hope for some real progress in U.S.-North Korean relations after Sunday morning’s unscheduled meeting between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, largely because Russia and China seem more determined than ever to facilitate forward movement.
Sitting down before the talks began, Kim underlined the importance of the meeting.“I hope it can be the foundation for better things that people will not be expecting,” he said. “Our great relationship will provide the magical power with which to overcome hardships and obstacles in the tasks that need to be done from now on.”
Trump was equally positive speaking of Kim:
“We’ve developed a very good relationship and we understand each other very well. I do believe he understands me, and I think I maybe understand him, and sometimes that can lead to very good things.”
Trump said the two sides would designate teams, with the U.S. team headed by special envoy Stephen Biegun under the auspices of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, to start work in the next two to three weeks. “They’ll start a process, and we’ll see what happens,” he said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, who met individually with President Trump at the G20 in Osaka, have been singing from the same sheet of Korea music — particularly in the wake of Xi’s visit to North Korea on June 20-21. Putin’s remarks are the most illuminating. 

“What we should be talking about is not how to make North Korea disarm, but how to ensure the unconditional security of North Korea and how to make any country, including North Korea, feel safe and protected by international law. …”
In an interview with The Financial Times, Putin pointed to “the tragedies of Libya and Iraq” — meaning, of course, what happened to each of them as they lacked a nuclear deterrent. Applying that lesson to North Korea, Putin said,
“We should think about guarantees, which we should use as the basis for talks with North Korea. We must take into account the dangers arising from … the presence of nuclear weapons,” he said, adding that if a way can be found to satisfy North Korea’s understandable determination to protect its security, “the situation may take a turn nobody can imagine today.”
“Whether we recognize North Korea as a nuclear power or not, the number of nuclear charges it has will not decrease. We must proceed from modern realities …” And those realities include fundamental, immediate security concerns for both Russia and China. Putin put it this way:
”[W]e have a common border, even if a short one, with North Korea, therefore, this problem has a direct bearing on us. The United States is located across the ocean … while we are right here, in this region, and the North Korean nuclear range is not far away from our border. This why this concerns us directly, and we never stop thinking about it.”
Xi’s ‘Reasonable Expectations’
Last week in Pyongyang, Chinese President Xi Jinping said China is waiting for a desired response in stalled nuclear talks with the United States.
“North Korea would like to remain patient, but it hopes the relevant party will meet halfway with North Korea to explore resolution plans that accommodate each other’s reasonable concerns,” he said.
A commentary in China’s official Xinhua news agency said China could play a unique role in breaking the cycle of mistrust between North Korea and the U.S, but that both sides “need to have reasonable expectations and refrain from imposing unilateral and unrealistic demands.”
There is little doubt that the Russians and Chinese have been comparing notes on what they see as a potentially explosive (literally) problem in their respective backyards, the more so inasmuch as the two countries have become allies in all but name.
On a three-day visit to Moscow in early June, President Xi spoke of his “deep personal friendship” with Putin, with whom he has “met nearly 30 times in the past six years.” For his part, Putin claimed “Russian-Chinese relations have reached an unprecedented level. It is a global partnership and strategic cooperation.”
A Fundamental Strategic Change
Whether they are “best friends” or not, the claim of unprecedented strategic cooperation happens to be true — and is the most fundamental change in the world strategic equation in decades. Given the fear they share that things could get out of hand in Korea with the mercurial Trump and his hawkish advisers calling the shots, it is a safe bet that Putin and Xi have been coordinating closely on North Korea.
The next step could be stepped-up efforts to persuade Trump that China and Russia can somehow guarantee continued nuclear restraint on Pyongyang’s part, in return for U.S. agreement to move step by step — rather than full bore — toward at least partial North Korean denuclearization — and perhaps some relaxation in U.S. economic sanctions. Xi and Putin may have broached that kind of deal to Trump in Osaka.
There is also a salutary sign that President Trump has learned more about the effects of a military conflict with North Korea, and that he has come to realize that Pyongyang already has not only a nuclear, but also a formidable conventional deterrent: massed artillery.
“There are 35 million people in Seoul, 25 miles away,” Trump said on Sunday. “All accessible by what they already have in the mountains. There’s nothing like that anywhere in terms of danger.”
Obstacles Still Formidable
Trump will have to remind his national security adviser, John Bolton, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, that he is the president and that he intends to take a firmer grip on reins regarding Korean policy. Given their maladroit performance on both Iran and Venezuela, it would, at first blush, seem easy to jettison the two super-hawks.
But this would mean running afoul of the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-Media-Academe-Think-Tank (MICIMATT) complex, in which the corporate-controlled media play thesine-qua-nonrole today.
In a harbinger of things to come, The Washington Post’s initial report on the outcome of the Trump-Kim talks contained two distortions: “Trump … misrepresented what had been achieved, claiming that North Korea had ceased ballistic missile tests and was continuing to send back remains of U.S. servicemen killed in the Korean War.”
The Trump administration could reasonably call that “fake news.” True, North Korea tested short-range ballistic missiles last spring, but Kim’s promise to Trump was to stop testing strategicnot tactical missiles, and North Korea has adhered to that promise. As for the return of the remains of U.S. servicemen: True, such remains that remain are no longer being sent back to the U.S., but it was the U.S. that put a stop to that after the summit in Hanoi failed. 
We can surely expect more disingenuous “reporting” of that kind.
Whether Trump can stand up to the MICIMATT on Korea remains to be seen. There is a huge amount of arms-maker-arms-dealer profiteering going on in the Far East, as long as tensions there can be stoked and kept at a sufficiently high level.
Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. His first portfolio at CIA was referent-analyst for Soviet policy toward China, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan. In retirement he co-founded Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

This article was originally published by "Consortium News" -

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51857.htm

JUST NEWS published this article following the Creative Commons rule. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.

Sunday, June 30, 2019

Trump Meets Kim Jong Un in DMZ, Becoming First U.S. President to Enter North Korea



Watch
Trump shook hands with Kim on Sunday and took 20 steps into North Korea, making history as the first sitting US leader to set foot in the hermit kingdom. The encounter at the heavily fortified Korean Demilitarized Zone — their third in person — came a day after Trump raised the prospect of a border handshake in a tweet and declared he’d have “no problem” stepping into North Korea.
Posted June 30, 2019


==See Also==



http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51843.htm

JUST NEWS published this article following the Creative Commons rule. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.

Tuesday, June 4, 2019

Top US Journalists Spread Fake News Claiming North Korean Official Was ‘Purged’ – Then He Shows Up on TV


Global Research, June 04, 2019

The Grayzone 3 June 2019


Virtually every major Western corporate media outlet and a who’s who of pundits circulated a blatantly false report that North Korean nuclear negotiators were killed and imprisoned, exposing their non-existent editorial standards on Official Enemies.
***
The corporate media’s editorial standards for reporting on Official Enemies of the US government, especially North Korea, are as low as ever. Blatantly false stories are regularly circulated by leading news outlets without any kind of accountability.
In the latest example of fake news disseminated without any hint of skepticism by America’s top journalists, virtually every major media outlet reported that a senior North Korean official named Kim Yong-chol was supposedly forced into a “labor camp,” as part of a larger deadly “purge.”
Two days later, that same official turned up alive at a public art performance, seated next to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
Bloomberg kicked off the fake news frenzy on May 30 by publishing a report claiming, “North Korea executed its former top nuclear envoy to the U.S. and four other foreign ministry officials in March after a failed summit between Kim and Donald Trump.”
Bloomberg’s source for this false story was South Korea’s far-right newspaper Chosun Ilbo, which has a long history of fabricating stories about North Korea. In turn, Chosun Ilbo’s story was based on a single unidentified source.
That is to say, the fake report obediently echoed by the Western press corps was based entirely on the claims of one unnamed person.
This obvious lack of evidence did not stop credulous reporters from jumping on the sensationalist propaganda. The false story was circulated by The New York TimesReutersThe Wall Street JournalThe HillThe Daily BeastFox NewsCNBCTIMEABC NewsThe Financial TimesThe TelegraphVICERolling StoneThe IndependentThe Washington TimesThe New York PostHuffPostFrance 24The Japan TimesHaaretzThe Times of Israel, the US government’s Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, and many more.
North Korea has executed its former top nuclear envoy Kim Hyok Chol as part of a deadly purge after the collapse of the in Vietnam, Chosun reports

More @business: https://bloom.bg/2YURULW 
209 people are talking about this
Twitter even went out of its way to create a shareable Moment based on the fake news.
Careful readers (only a small percentage of total readers) might have noticed that Bloomberg quietly admitted in its original report, “Previous South Korean media reports about senior North Korean officials being executed following the talks have proven false.” But this concession didn’t stop the rest of the corporate media from running with this fake story.
On June 2, the commentariat’s favorite fable fell apart: North Korea’s nuclear negotiator Kim Yong-chol showed up on state media, sitting a few seats away from Kim Jong-un at a musical performance.
The Associated PressReutersThe New York Times, and CNN quickly published new reports making light of the news  — but none of these contained mea culpas or official retractions.
As of June 3, the vast majority of blatantly false reports published in dozens of outlets remain uncorrected.
The Grayzone has documented the long history of the US corporate media printing cartoonish lies about North Korea(officially known as the DPRK), especially in the form of execution stories that are quickly debunked. (The New York Times once even cited an obvious parody Twitter account as if it were the DPRK’s real state media.)
A few actual experts on Korea did raise concerns about the latest hoax. Among them was veteran reporter Tim Shorrock, who has spent decades reporting on Korea, and who joined prominent peace activists Christine Ahn and Simone Chun in questioning the bogus story.
Shorrock cautioned on May 31,
“It’s important to keep tabs on this one, which if uncorroborated could turn out to be one of the biggest fiascos in journalism history.”
As usual, Shorrock was right — but he was an outlier whose critical thinking was drowned out by a mob of mainstream pundits.
Below is a list of some of the top journalists in the US corporate media and political class, including ostensible “progressives,” who spread this blatantly false story. Many of these self-styled progressives promoted the hoax in hopes of embarrassing Donald Trump for embarking on a historic peace process with the DPRK.
Journalists and activists who spread the fake news
Chris Hayes, a media celebrity and MSNBC host who used the fake news to get in a cheap joke about Trump
Anxiously hoping the President doesn't tweet something about how the DPRK's envoy deserved what he got and Kim Jong Un is great.
857 people are talking about this
Julia Ioffe, a prominent journalist, GQ Magazine correspondent, and so-called “Russia expert”
Yashar Ali, a contributor to New York Magazine and the Huffington Post and liberal mini-celebrity
2. Remember this moment?

Well the North Korean official standing next to POTUS, Kim Yong Chol, is now in a North Korean labor camp on the orders of Kim Jong-Un pic.twitter.com/siV3HKUbOj
View image on Twitter
732 people are talking about this
Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent for The New York Times and an analyst for MSNBC
Jon Cooper, the chairman of the Democratic Coalition Against Trump, which proudly boasts, “We help run #TheResistance”
Katie Phang, a legal contributor for NBC and MSNBC
David Roberts, a reporter for Vox
Caroline Orr, a neoliberal “Resistance” influencer who rose to prominence by pumping up the Russiagate narrative
Oz Katerji, a rabid pro-military intervention regime-change activist dedicated to harassing anti-imperialists online
Josh Smith, a Reuters senior correspondent covering North and South Korea
South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo reports that North Korea has executed several officials involved in working level talks before the Hanoi Trump-Kim summit, including Kim Hyok Chol the former ambassador to Spain who (briefly now it seems) served as Steve Biegun’s counterpart
2,483 people are talking about this
Vivian Salama, a White House reporter for the Wall Street Journal, who previously worked as AP’s Baghdad bureau chief
Matt Bevan, the host and writer of ABC News Australia’s “Russia, If You’re Listening” podcast
Kaitlan Collins, a CNN White House reporter
Geoff Bennett, a White House correspondent for NBC News
Andrew Desiderio, a political reporter at Politico
David Nakamura, a Washington Post reporter
Amy Siskind, a prominent liberal anti-Trump activist and former Wall Street executive
Steve Silberman, a longtime writer for Wired Magazine
Rare exceptions
There were a few exceptions to the norm. Some reporters who specialize on Korea did raise concerns, pointing out South Korean media outlets have a long history of publishing false stories about the DPRK.
These warnings, however, were ignored.
We need better sourcing for this @Chosun report saying ’s lead US negotiator was executed. I remember the time South Korean media reported in 2010 that a soccer coach had been executed. And then I ran into him at airport. https://n.news.naver.com/article/023/0003450351 
69 people are talking about this
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Ben Norton is a journalist and writer. He is a reporter for The Grayzone, and the producer of the Moderate Rebels podcast, which he co-hosts with Max Blumenthal. His website is BenNorton.com, and he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.


https://www.globalresearch.ca/top-us-journalists-spread-fake-news-claiming-north-korean-official-was-purged-then-he-shows-tv/5679542

JUST NEWS published this article following the Creative Commons rule. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.